Sanity vs Contentful vs SonicJS: Premium CMS Showdown
Compare Sanity, Contentful, and SonicJS headless CMS platforms. Real-time collaboration, enterprise pricing, and edge performance analyzed.

Sanity vs Contentful vs SonicJS: Premium CMS Showdown
TL;DR — Sanity offers best-in-class real-time collaboration but usage-based pricing surprises teams. Contentful is enterprise-focused with $60k+/year pricing. SonicJS delivers edge-first performance with predictable costs under $20/month.
Key Stats:
- Sanity: Custom roles require $949/month enterprise plan
- Contentful: 45% of users report performance issues during peak usage
- SonicJS: Under 50ms globally, zero cold starts
- Both Sanity & Contentful: Usage-based pricing with escalating costs
Sanity and Contentful are two leading SaaS headless CMS platforms with overlapping enterprise focus but different strengths. SonicJS offers a fundamentally different approach with edge-first architecture.
Quick Comparison
| Feature | Sanity | Contentful | SonicJS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Cloud SaaS | Cloud SaaS | Edge (Cloudflare Workers) |
| Pricing Model | Usage-based | Tiered enterprise | Predictable flat rate |
| Real-time Collab | Best-in-class | Basic | Roadmap |
| Query Language | GROQ | REST/GraphQL | REST API |
| Data Storage | Proprietary | Proprietary | D1 (you own it) |
| Cold starts | N/A (SaaS) | N/A (SaaS) | 0-5ms |
| Global latency | CDN-cached | CDN-cached | Under 50ms (edge-native) |
| Custom Roles (free) | No | No | Yes |
| Open Source | Studio only | No | Yes (MIT) |
The Real Problems
Sanity: Pricing Surprises and Learning Curves
Sanity's usage-based model catches teams off guard:
"Started at $99/month, ended up at $400+ with document growth and API calls we didn't anticipate."
GROQ learning curve:
"GROQ is its own thing. Your team needs to learn yet another query syntax that's useful nowhere else."
Common Sanity frustrations:
- Custom roles require enterprise plan ($949/month)
- Studio keystroke lag with large documents (GitHub Issue #7456)
- Preview integration complexity with Next.js
- Proprietary data format creates lock-in
- Slow builds reported (10+ minutes)
Real-world example: Cursor.com famously spent $260 and developer time migrating away from Sanity to markdown files.
Contentful: Enterprise Everything
Contentful is built for enterprise budgets:
"Premium starts at $60,000/year. Space add-ons can reach $75,000+ each."
Common Contentful frustrations:
- 45% of users report slow performance during peak usage
- Content type limits on non-enterprise plans
- No true relational models
- Heavy developer dependency
- 40% faced integration challenges
- Publishing affects all environments at once
SonicJS: Honest Limitations
SonicJS is newer and building rapidly:
- Real-time collaboration on roadmap (not shipped)
- Smaller plugin ecosystem
- D1 database only
- Fewer enterprise integrations currently
Architecture Comparison
Sanity: Real-Time First
Sanity's architecture prioritizes collaboration:
// Sanity Studio configuration
export default defineConfig({
projectId: 'your-project',
dataset: 'production',
schema: { types: schemaTypes },
})
Strengths:
- Multiple editors, same document, real-time
- Live presence indicators
- Instant sync across clients
Trade-offs:
- GROQ query language lock-in
- Proprietary data storage
- Usage-based pricing unpredictability
Contentful: Enterprise SaaS
Enterprise-grade with enterprise complexity:
const client = createClient({
space: 'space_id',
accessToken: 'access_token',
})
Strengths:
- Robust governance and workflows
- Extensive integration marketplace
- Enterprise compliance features
Trade-offs:
- Significant pricing
- Content type limitations
- Performance issues reported
SonicJS: Edge-First
Runs globally on Cloudflare Workers:
import { createSonicJS } from '@sonicjs-cms/core'
const cms = createSonicJS({
database: env.DB,
cache: env.CACHE,
storage: env.STORAGE,
})
export default cms.app
Strengths:
- Under 50ms response worldwide
- Zero cold starts
- Your data, full ownership
- Predictable pricing
Performance Analysis
Sanity
- Good performance via CDN caching
- Studio can lag with large documents
- Build times can extend to 10+ minutes
- GROQ queries optimized for their backend
Contentful
- CDN-cached for reads
- 45% report peak-time slowdowns
- API rate limits can throttle high-volume apps
- Dynamic queries hit origin servers
SonicJS
- Under 50ms globally (edge-native)
- Zero cold starts
- Three-tier caching (memory → KV → D1)
- Consistent performance regardless of load
Key difference: Sanity and Contentful cache content at the edge. SonicJS runs the entire CMS at the edge—no origin round-trips for API calls.
Pricing Deep Dive
Sanity Pricing
Published tiers:
- Free: 100k API requests/month, 500k documents
- Growth: $15/user/month + usage
- Enterprise: $949/month minimum
Watch out for:
- Document count limits
- API request overages
- Asset bandwidth charges
- Custom roles only on enterprise
Real-world example: A mid-size marketing site easily hits $300-500/month with moderate traffic.
Contentful Pricing
Enterprise tiers:
- Premium: $60,000/year list
- Premium Plus: $140,000/year list
- Space add-ons: $8,000-75,000+ each
Negotiated rates:
- 40-45% discounts common on large deals
- Still $35,000-80,000/year typical
SonicJS Pricing
Cloudflare-based:
- Free tier: 100,000 requests/day, 10GB D1
- Workers Paid: $5/month flat
- Typical production site: $5-20/month
No surprises:
- No per-seat charges
- No usage overages
- No feature gating
Query Languages
Sanity: GROQ
Powerful but proprietary:
*[_type == "post" && publishedAt < now()]{
title,
"author": author->name,
categories[]->
}
Pros: Powerful, flexible Cons: Learning curve, only useful in Sanity
Contentful: REST/GraphQL
Standard approaches:
query {
postCollection {
items {
title
author { name }
}
}
}
SonicJS: REST API
Clean, intuitive:
curl https://your-site.workers.dev/api/content/posts?status=published
Philosophy: Standard patterns that transfer to any system.
Real-Time Collaboration
Sanity: Best-in-Class
Genuinely excellent real-time collaboration:
- Multiple editors, same document
- Live presence indicators
- Instant sync
- No conflict resolution needed
If real-time collaboration is your primary requirement, Sanity excels.
Contentful: Basic
- Draft/publish workflow
- Content locking
- No real-time co-editing
SonicJS: Roadmap
- Optimistic locking current
- Real-time collaboration planned
- Clear conflict resolution
Data Ownership & Lock-in
Sanity
- Proprietary data format
- GROQ creates query lock-in
- Export available but transformation required
- Cursor.com's migration cost: $260 + developer time
Contentful
- Proprietary format
- Content type limits create artificial constraints
- Export requires significant transformation
- Space structure doesn't map to other systems
SonicJS
- Standard SQLite in D1
- Export anytime
- No proprietary formats
- MIT licensed, truly open source
When to Choose Each
Choose Sanity If:
- Real-time collaboration is essential
- Budget can handle usage-based pricing
- Team can learn GROQ
- Lock-in is acceptable
Choose Contentful If:
- Enterprise budget available ($60k+/year)
- Extensive compliance requirements
- Large integration ecosystem needed
- Enterprise governance essential
Choose SonicJS If:
- Global performance is critical
- Predictable costs matter
- Data ownership is required
- Edge-first architecture appeals
FAQ
Is Sanity's real-time collaboration worth the pricing?
For content teams that heavily collaborate in real-time, yes. For API-first usage or solo content creators, probably not worth the complexity.
Can SonicJS match Contentful's enterprise features?
Core CMS features, yes. Contentful has more compliance certifications and enterprise integrations. SonicJS offers edge performance neither can match.
Why did Cursor.com leave Sanity?
They switched to markdown files for simplicity and control. Their experience highlighted the migration cost from proprietary platforms.
What about preview functionality?
- Sanity: Powerful but complex to configure
- Contentful: Built-in preview environments
- SonicJS: Live preview with simple setup
Conclusion
Three SaaS approaches:
- Sanity: Real-time collaboration leader with usage-based pricing risk
- Contentful: Enterprise fortress with enterprise pricing
- SonicJS: Edge-first performance with data ownership
For teams prioritizing global performance, predictable costs, and avoiding vendor lock-in, SonicJS provides a modern alternative.
Key Takeaways
- Sanity's custom roles require $949/month enterprise plan
- Contentful Premium starts at $60,000/year
- Both use usage-based pricing that can escalate unexpectedly
- SonicJS delivers under 50ms global latency for $5-20/month
- Edge-first architecture provides performance neither SaaS can match
Ready to try edge-first CMS? Get started with SonicJS in under 5 minutes.
Sources & References
Sanity
Contentful
Related Articles

Strapi vs Contentful vs SonicJS: Self-Hosted vs SaaS vs Edge
Compare Strapi, Contentful, and SonicJS headless CMS. Self-hosted flexibility, enterprise SaaS, and edge-first performance compared.

Strapi vs Sanity vs SonicJS: Headless CMS Showdown
Compare Strapi, Sanity, and SonicJS headless CMS platforms. Learn about pricing, performance, developer experience, and which one fits your project.

Directus vs Sanity vs SonicJS: Database Wrapper vs SaaS vs Edge
Compare Directus, Sanity, and SonicJS headless CMS. Database flexibility, real-time collaboration, and edge-first performance analyzed.