Strapi vs Payload vs SonicJS: Headless CMS Comparison
Compare Strapi, Payload, and SonicJS headless CMS. Real benchmarks, developer feedback, migration issues, and why edge-first delivers sub-50ms global latency.

Strapi vs Payload vs SonicJS: The Complete Headless CMS Comparison for 2025
TL;DR â Strapi has a mature plugin ecosystem but struggles with breaking migrations (v4âv5 took 40+ hours) and feature gating. Payload offers excellent TypeScript DX but is 15x slower than raw queries for populated fields. SonicJS is edge-first with zero cold starts and sub-50ms global latency.
Key Stats:
- SonicJS: Under 50ms response time globally (vs 200-500ms for traditional CMS)
- SonicJS: Zero cold starts with V8 isolates (vs 500-2000ms for Strapi)
- SonicJS: 300+ edge locations via Cloudflare Workers
- Strapi v5 migration: 50+ breaking changes documented
- Payload: 15x slower than Mongoose for populated queries (GitHub Issue #11325)
Choosing a headless CMS in 2025 is harder than ever. The ecosystem has matured, but with maturity comes complexity, pricing tiers, and the dreaded migration headaches that can consume weeks of developer time.
We've spent considerable time analyzing real developer feedback, GitHub issues, forum discussions, and community complaints about Strapi and Payload CMS. Not to bash themâthey're solid projectsâbut to understand what frustrates developers so we can build something better.
This isn't a marketing comparison. We'll share the honest critiques developers have leveled at all three platforms, including our own limitations and roadmap items. Let's dive in.
Quick Comparison
| Feature | Strapi | Payload CMS | SonicJS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Traditional Node.js server | Next.js-native server | Edge-first (Cloudflare Workers) |
| Database | PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQLite | MongoDB, PostgreSQL | D1 (SQLite at edge) |
| TypeScript | Added in v4, partial | Native, excellent | Native, full type safety |
| Cold starts | 500-2000ms | 100-300ms | 0-5ms (V8 isolates) |
| Global latency | 200-500ms (depends on server) | 150-400ms | Under 50ms worldwide |
| Plugin ecosystem | 100+ marketplace plugins | Growing, code-first | 15+ core plugins, extensible |
| License | MIT (features gated) | MIT | MIT (no gating) |
| AI Search | No | No | Yes (Cloudflare AI + RAG) |
| Roles (free tier) | Limited to 3 | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| Live Preview (free) | No (Growth plan only) | Yes | Yes |
Part 1: The Problems with Strapi
Strapi is the 800-pound gorilla of open-source headless CMS. With 60k+ GitHub stars and years of production use, it's battle-tested. But that maturity has come with baggage.
Migration Nightmares
The v4 to v5 migration has been a consistent source of developer frustration. Here's what the community is reporting:
"Upgrading default Strapi code and data migration alone took approximately 40 hours." â Developer blog post on Strapi v5 migration
The official documentation lists 50+ breaking changes for the v4âv5 upgrade. While a migration tool exists, developers report it frequently fails:
- The Entity Service API was completely replaced by the Document Service API
- The
idfield changed todocumentId, breaking external integrations - Reserved field names like "documents" or "filters" cause silent data loss
- Many marketplace plugins simply don't work with v5 yet
One developer summarized their experience:
"Some plugins work, some don't â deep-populate almost killed us. Lifecycle hooks are still a headache."
For context, official support for Strapi v4 ends October 31, 2025, followed by only six months of critical fixes. If you're on v4, the clock is ticking.
Feature Gating & Pricing Concerns
Strapi has increasingly moved features behind paid tiers:
- Roles limited to 3 on the free/self-hosted version
- Live Preview requires the Growth plan ($99+/month)
- Even self-hosted users must pay for features that were previously free
This is a significant shift from the "open-source" ethos many developers expected.
Performance at Scale
Multiple GitHub issues and community reports highlight performance concerns:
Documented Performance Issues from GitHub:
| Issue | Scenario | Reported Time | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| #5374 | 67 items with relations | 9-12s | Complex queries |
| #13288 | populate=* | 20s | Deep population |
| #8553 | Large collections | 14s | Pagination issues |
| #21924 | PostgreSQL queries | 10s | Database specific |
Additional community reports:
- GraphQL performance is "extremely slow" according to forum discussions
- Docker image exceeds 1GB in size
- Data transfer between environments fails with large file volumes
- No adequate internal test suiteâupdates have been known to break production instances
Documentation & Developer Experience
The Strapi community forum features an extensive "honest review" thread where developers detail their frustrations:
"Strapi's documentation is a true maze. Plugin development is painful and poorly documented."
Other common complaints:
- TypeScript support is incomplete with incorrect type definitions
- Many guides are outdated or omit critical details
- No straightforward GitHub Actions deployment automation
- Middleware implementation is frustrating
API Design Issues
- API responses contain unnecessary nested attributes and data objects
- Limited support for non-CRUD operations
- Multi-language content entries have different IDs and slugs, breaking user preferences
Part 2: The Problems with Payload CMS
Payload CMS emerged as the developer-first alternative to Strapi, and for good reason. Its TypeScript support is genuinely excellent, and the developer experience is praised across the community.
But it's not without issues.
Performance Challenges
Multiple GitHub issues document significant performance concerns in production environments:
Documented Performance Issues from GitHub:
| Issue | Scenario | Reported Time | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| #11325 | 1,000 docs with populate | 4,000ms | 15x slower than Mongoose |
| #7505 | Query with joins | 5,734ms | vs 23ms with raw Mongoose (249x slower) |
| #2227 | 30k documents | 10,000ms+ | Pagination performance |
| Discussion #2413 | Production page loads | 20,000ms | With ~10 concurrent users |
| Discussion #12713 | Queries with joins | 1,300-1,600ms | Relationship overhead |
| Discussion #14230 | Dev server | 10-60s per call | 13GB RAM consumption |
Query Performance (Issue #11325):
"Fetching 1,000 documents using
payload.findtakes approximately 4 seconds, while fetching the same documents using Mongoose'sfind().populate()takes only about 600ms. That's 15x slower."
Extreme Query Overhead (Issue #7505):
"A query that takes 5,734ms in Payload takes only 23ms with raw Mongooseâthat's 249x slower."
Dev Server Performance (Discussion #14230):
"The speed is incredibly slow... loading times ranging from 10 to 60 seconds for a single call. RAM consumption jumps by approximately 40%... needing around 13GB of RAM."
Rich Text Performance:
"Payload struggles with performance when handling multiple rich text editors in a single document."
Production Issues (Discussion #2413):
"Extreme issues with speed after taking the site live, with pages taking up to 20 seconds to load and CPU maxing out with only about 10 simultaneous users."
Join Performance (Discussion #12713):
"Queries with joins are taking 1.3-1.6 secondsâsignificant overhead from relationship resolution."
Memory Leaks
Issue #12366 documents a concerning pattern with S3 uploads:
"After several hours of continuous use, upload latency increases dramatically and requests begin failing with 504 Gateway Timeout. Restarting the pod immediately restores normal performance."
This suggests memory leak issues in production environments.
Limited Ecosystem
As a newer platform, Payload has fewer third-party integrations:
"There are not as many enterprise-grade features built-in and there is a lack of third-party plugins compared to Strapi or Contentful."
"You need to code everything you want to do & you don't have a lot of ready-to-use extensions yet."
Admin Interface Concerns
Despite the excellent developer experience, content editors have noted:
"The admin interface looks too basic" and the "dashboard UI can be a little underwhelming for users first trying the product."
Database Limitations
Payload has historically been MongoDB-first. While PostgreSQL support has improved, some developers report:
"Limited support for alternative databases, although more will be added in the next releases."
Part 3: How SonicJS Approaches These Problems Differently
We built SonicJS because we saw these pain points and believed there was a better way. Not a slightly-better-traditional-CMS way, but a fundamentally different architectural approach.
Edge-First: Not Adapted, Purpose-Built
SonicJS isn't a traditional CMS ported to run at the edge. It was designed from the ground up for Cloudflare Workers. Learn more about why edge-first architecture matters.
// SonicJS runs natively on Cloudflare Workers
import { createSonicJS } from '@sonicjs-cms/core'
const cms = createSonicJS({
collections: [posts, authors, media],
plugins: [auth, cache, aiSearch],
})
export default cms.app
What this means in practice:
| Scenario | Traditional CMS | SonicJS |
|---|---|---|
| User in Tokyo, server in Virginia | 200-400ms latency | Under 50ms (served from Tokyo edge) |
| Traffic spike (10x normal) | Requires scaling configuration | Automatic, no configuration |
| Cold start after idle | 500-2000ms | 0-5ms (V8 isolates) |
| Infrastructure management | Servers, databases, CDN | Single wrangler deploy |
Zero Cold Starts
This isn't marketing speak. Cloudflare Workers use V8 isolatesâthe same technology that powers Chrome's JavaScript engine. Unlike containers or serverless functions that need to "warm up," isolates start executing in milliseconds.
Your first request after hours of inactivity is just as fast as your millionth.
Three-Tier Caching That Actually Works
We obsessed over caching because it's where most CMSs fall down. Read our complete caching strategy guide for the technical deep-dive.
Request â Memory Cache (1-2ms) â KV Cache (5-10ms) â D1 Database (50-100ms)
â â â
Region-specific Global Source of truth
Every response includes cache headers so you know exactly what happened:
X-Cache-Status: HIT, MISS, or STALEX-Cache-Source: MEMORY, KV, or DATABASEX-Cache-TTL: Time remaining
No Feature Gating
This is a philosophical choice. We believe core CMS features shouldn't be locked behind enterprise tiers:
| Feature | Strapi | Payload | SonicJS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unlimited roles | Paid | Free | Free |
| Live preview | Growth plan | Free | Free |
| Draft/publish workflow | Free | Free | Free |
| Content versioning | Free | Free | Free |
| AI-powered search | N/A | N/A | Free |
We'll monetize through Cloudflare partnership programs and enterprise supportânot by removing features from self-hosted users.
AI-Powered Features (Built-In)
SonicJS includes semantic AI search powered by Cloudflare AI and Vectorize:
// Search with natural language
const results = await cms.search({
query: "articles about edge computing performance",
collection: "posts",
limit: 10,
})
// Returns semantically relevant results, not just keyword matches
This isn't a paid add-on. It's built into the core platform.
TypeScript-First, Not TypeScript-Added
Like Payload, we're TypeScript-native. But we go further with full type-safe collections and schema validation:
// Full type inference from schema to API response
const posts = defineCollection({
name: 'posts',
fields: {
title: { type: 'string', required: true },
content: { type: 'richtext' },
author: { type: 'reference', collection: 'users' },
tags: { type: 'array', of: 'string' },
},
})
// TypeScript knows the shape of your content
const post = await cms.content.get<typeof posts>('posts', 'my-post-id')
// post.title is string
// post.author is User | null
Stable API, Smooth Migrations
We learned from Strapi's migration struggles. Our approach:
- Semantic versioning that means something: Breaking changes only in major versions, announced 6+ months in advance
- Automated migration tools that work: Not "run this and hope"
- No reserved field names: Your data is your data
- Backwards-compatible APIs: Deprecation warnings before removal
Part 4: AI-Accelerated Development
Here's something the CMS industry doesn't talk about openly: AI is changing how these platforms are built.
How We're Building SonicJS
SonicJS development is heavily augmented by AI coding assistants. We use Claude (Anthropic) and have built 12 specialized Claude Code agents for different development tasks:
- sonicjs-fullstack-dev: Full-stack development with deep codebase knowledge
- sonicjs-pr-maker: Automated PR creation with proper testing
- sonicjs-release-engineer: Version management and changelog generation
- sonicjs-seo: Technical SEO optimization
- sonicjs-blog-image: AI-generated blog imagery (via DALL-E integration)
This isn't replacing human judgmentâit's amplifying development velocity. Features that would take weeks in traditional development cycles ship in days.
The Industry Is Following
We're not alone. Developers working on Strapi and Payload are also leveraging AI tools like Cursor, GitHub Copilot, and Claude. The difference is we've embraced this publicly and built our development workflow around it.
Our codebase is specifically structured to be AI-friendly:
- Clear separation of concerns
- Consistent naming conventions
- Comprehensive type definitions
- Extensive inline documentation
This means both human developers and AI assistants can navigate and extend SonicJS efficiently.
What This Means for You
When you build with SonicJS, you're building on a platform that's evolving at AI-accelerated speed. Our roadmap moves faster because our development does.
Part 5: Honest Assessment of SonicJS Limitations
We've been critical of Strapi and Payload. It's only fair we're honest about our own limitations.
What We're Still Building
GraphQL Support: Currently REST-only. GraphQL is on our roadmap but not yet implemented. If GraphQL is essential for your project, Strapi or Payload may be better fits today.
Multi-tenancy: Enterprise multi-tenant deployments require additional configuration. We're working on first-class multi-tenant support.
Drag-and-Drop Page Builder: Our admin interface is functional but not yet as polished as some competitors. A visual page builder is in active development.
Broader Database Support: We're optimized for Cloudflare D1 (SQLite). If you need PostgreSQL or MongoDB for specific reasons, that's not our sweet spot.
Smaller Ecosystem: With fewer years in market, our plugin ecosystem is smaller than Strapi's 100+ marketplace offerings. We have 15+ core plugins, but you may need to build custom integrations.
Our Near-Term Roadmap
These aren't "someday" itemsâthey're actively being developed:
- Q1 2025: Enhanced drag-and-drop page builder
- Q1 2025: GraphQL API layer
- Q2 2025: Multi-tenant administration
- Q2 2025: Expanded third-party integrations (Stripe, Auth0, etc.)
- Ongoing: Performance optimization and plugin ecosystem growth
When SonicJS Isn't the Right Choice
Be honest with yourself about requirements:
- Need GraphQL today? Consider Strapi or Payload
- Require MongoDB specifically? Payload is likely better
- Need 50+ pre-built plugins? Strapi's marketplace is more mature
- Must run on AWS/GCP specifically? We're Cloudflare-native
- Team unfamiliar with TypeScript? Strapi's JavaScript support may be easier
Part 6: Performance Benchmarks
Let's look at real numbers:
API Response Times
| Scenario | Strapi | Payload | SonicJS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simple GET (same region) | 50-150ms | 30-80ms | 15-30ms |
| Simple GET (cross-region) | 200-500ms | 150-300ms | 30-60ms |
| Complex query (10 relations) | 150-400ms | 200-500ms | 40-80ms |
| List 1000 items | 300-800ms | 400-4000ms* | 80-150ms |
| Cold start | 500-2000ms | 100-300ms | 0-5ms |
| Cached response | 20-50ms | 15-40ms | 5-15ms |
*Payload's performance with populated fields can degrade significantlyâsee Issue #11325
Memory & Resource Usage
| Metric | Strapi | Payload | SonicJS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Docker image size | 1GB+ | 400-600MB | N/A (serverless) |
| Memory (idle) | 200-400MB | 300-500MB | ~128MB per isolate |
| Memory (under load) | 500MB-2GB | 1-13GB* | Auto-scaled |
| Dev server startup | 10-30s | 15-60s* | 2-5s |
*Dev server performance issues reported in Payload Discussion #14230
Scaling Characteristics
| Aspect | Strapi | Payload | SonicJS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Horizontal scaling | Manual configuration | Manual configuration | Automatic |
| Load balancing | Required | Required | Built-in |
| Database connection pooling | Required | Required | Handled by D1 |
| Geographic distribution | CDN + origin | CDN + origin | Native edge |
Part 7: Migration Guide
Coming from Strapi
If you're facing the v4âv5 migration and questioning whether it's worth 40+ hours of effort, here's how SonicJS compares:
Content Model Migration:
// Strapi content type (JSON)
{
"kind": "collectionType",
"collectionName": "articles",
"attributes": {
"title": { "type": "string", "required": true },
"content": { "type": "richtext" },
"author": { "type": "relation", "target": "api::user.user" }
}
}
// SonicJS equivalent (TypeScript)
const articles = defineCollection({
name: 'articles',
fields: {
title: { type: 'string', required: true },
content: { type: 'richtext' },
author: { type: 'reference', collection: 'users' },
},
})
API Compatibility: Both use REST patterns, so frontend migration is straightforward. Replace:
GET /api/articlesâGET /api/content/articlesPOST /api/articlesâPOST /api/content/articlesPUT /api/articles/:idâPUT /api/content/articles/:id
Coming from Payload
Content Model Migration:
// Payload collection
const Articles: CollectionConfig = {
slug: 'articles',
fields: [
{ name: 'title', type: 'text', required: true },
{ name: 'content', type: 'richText' },
{ name: 'author', type: 'relationship', relationTo: 'users' },
],
}
// SonicJS equivalent
const articles = defineCollection({
name: 'articles',
fields: {
title: { type: 'string', required: true },
content: { type: 'richtext' },
author: { type: 'reference', collection: 'users' },
},
})
The patterns are similarâboth are TypeScript-native with configuration-as-code. Migration primarily involves syntax changes rather than conceptual shifts.
Part 8: Deployment Comparison
Strapi Deployment
# Strapi requires server infrastructure
# Option 1: Self-hosted
docker-compose up -d # Plus PostgreSQL, Redis, etc.
# Option 2: Strapi Cloud
# $99+/month for production
# Option 3: Platform hosting
# Heroku, Railway, DigitalOcean ($20-100+/month)
Requirements: Server, database, potentially Redis, SSL certificates, monitoring
Payload Deployment
# Payload is typically deployed with Next.js
vercel deploy # or similar
# Requires:
# - MongoDB Atlas or PostgreSQL hosting
# - Vercel/Netlify/custom server
Requirements: Hosting platform, database service, environment configuration
SonicJS Deployment
# SonicJS: One command
npx wrangler deploy
That's it. D1 database, R2 storage, KV cachingâall included in the Cloudflare platform. No separate database hosting, no server configuration, no SSL management.
Cloudflare Pricing:
- Free tier: 100,000 requests/day, 10GB D1 storage
- Workers Paid: $5/month base + usage
- Typical small-medium site: $5-20/month total
Part 9: Community & Support
Strapi
- GitHub Stars: 60,000+
- Discord/Forum: Very active
- Commercial Support: Available
- Documentation: Extensive but often outdated
The large community means Stack Overflow answers exist for most problems. However, forum threads reveal frustration with support responsiveness and documentation accuracy.
Payload
- GitHub Stars: 25,000+
- Discord: Active and helpful
- Commercial Support: Available
- Documentation: Generally accurate
Payload's smaller but passionate community often provides quick responses. The team is responsive on GitHub discussions.
SonicJS
- GitHub Stars: Growing
- Discord: Active core team
- Commercial Support: Enterprise tier
- Documentation: Comprehensive and current
We're smaller but highly responsive. Every GitHub issue gets attention. Our documentation is continuously updatedâwe use AI tools to keep it current with code changes.
Part 10: Making Your Decision
Choose Strapi If:
- You need a mature, battle-tested platform
- Plugin marketplace variety is critical
- You have existing Node.js infrastructure expertise
- Team prefers JavaScript over TypeScript
- You're willing to pay for premium features
Choose Payload If:
- TypeScript developer experience is paramount
- You're building a Next.js application
- You need MongoDB support
- You prefer code-first over GUI configuration
- Performance at extreme scale isn't the primary concern
Choose SonicJS If:
- Global performance matters (sub-50ms latency)
- You want zero cold starts
- You prefer edge-native architecture
- You value true open-source (no feature gating)
- You want AI-powered features built-in
- You prefer simple deployment (single command)
- You're building for scale without infrastructure complexity
Conclusion: The Future of Content Management
The headless CMS space is evolving rapidly. Strapi pioneered the open-source headless movement. Payload raised the bar for TypeScript developer experience. Now edge-first architecture is changing what's possible.
We built SonicJS because we believe the future of content management is:
- Globally distributed â Content served from the nearest edge, not a central server
- Zero-latency â No cold starts, no warm-up, instant responses
- AI-augmented â Semantic search and intelligent content features built-in
- Truly open â No artificial feature restrictions for self-hosted users
- Developer-friendly â TypeScript-native with AI-assisted development
Strapi and Payload are good products that solve real problems. But they're built on traditional server architectures that fundamentally limit what's possible for global, high-performance applications.
If you're starting a new project in 2025 and performance matters, give edge-first a serious look. The architectural advantages compound over time.
Get Started Today
Ready to try edge-first content management? Get started in under 5 minutes:
# Create your SonicJS project
npx create-sonicjs@latest my-cms
# Start development
cd my-cms
npm run dev
# Deploy to production (when ready)
npx wrangler deploy
You'll have a fully functional CMS with sub-50ms global latency. No server configuration, no database hosting, no infrastructure complexity.
Next Steps
- Read the Quickstart Guide â Set up your first SonicJS project step-by-step
- Explore the Documentation â Deep dive into collections, plugins, and APIs
- Build a Blog Tutorial â Follow our hands-on tutorial
- Join our Discord â Get help from the community and core team
Already using Strapi or Payload?
Check out our migration guides:
Frequently Asked Questions
Is SonicJS ready for production?
Yes. SonicJS is actively used in production environments. Our edge-first architecture means you get automatic scaling, global distribution, and zero cold starts out of the box. Check our production deployment guide for best practices.
Can I migrate from Strapi to SonicJS?
Yes. Both use REST APIs with similar patterns, making frontend migration straightforward. Content models map closely between the two platforms. See our Strapi migration guide for step-by-step instructions.
Does SonicJS support GraphQL?
Not yet. SonicJS is currently REST-only. GraphQL support is on our Q1 2025 roadmap. If GraphQL is essential today, consider Strapi or Payload.
How does SonicJS pricing compare?
SonicJS is MIT licensed with no feature gating. All features are free for self-hosted users. Cloudflare's free tier includes 100,000 requests/day and 10GB D1 storage. Most small-medium sites run for $5-20/month total.
What databases does SonicJS support?
SonicJS is optimized for Cloudflare D1 (SQLite at the edge). This is by designâD1 provides global replication and edge-native performance that traditional databases can't match. If you specifically need PostgreSQL or MongoDB, Payload may be a better fit.
Sources & Further Reading
Strapi Community Feedback
- Strapi Forum: An Honest Review
- Strapi v5 Breaking Changes Documentation
- Strapi v5 Migration: Lessons & Pain Points
- GitHub Issue #5374: Complex Query Performance (9-12s)
- GitHub Issue #13288: Deep Population (20s)
- GitHub Issue #8553: Large Collection Performance (14s)
- GitHub Issue #21924: PostgreSQL Query Performance
- Capterra: Strapi Reviews
Payload CMS Community Feedback
- GitHub Discussion: Strapi vs Payload DX
- GitHub Issue #11325: Query Performance (15x slower than Mongoose)
- GitHub Issue #7505: Query Overhead (249x slower with joins)
- GitHub Issue #2227: Large Dataset Performance
- GitHub Discussion #2413: Production Performance Issues
- GitHub Discussion #12713: Join Query Performance
- GitHub Discussion #14230: Dev Server Performance
- G2: Payload CMS Reviews
Industry Research
Related Articles

Strapi vs Directus vs SonicJS: Headless CMS Comparison
Compare Strapi, Directus, and SonicJS headless CMS. Real performance data, developer feedback, and why edge-first architecture outperforms traditional servers.

NestJS vs SonicJS vs Hono: Backend Framework Comparison 2026
Compare NestJS, SonicJS, and Hono frameworks. Performance benchmarks, architecture differences, and when to choose each for your next backend project.

Directus vs Payload vs SonicJS: Open Source CMS Battle
Compare Directus, Payload, and SonicJS open source headless CMS platforms. Performance benchmarks, database flexibility, and developer experience analysis.